[摘要] 目的 探讨门诊无痛人流术中舒适护理的应用效果。方法 方便选取2018年2月—2019年3月到该院进行无痛人流术的166例人工流产患者，区组随机法分为对照组(83例)与观察组(83例)，前者采用基础护理，后者应用舒适护理，比较两组Kolcaba、SAS、SDS、并发症发生率、护理满意率、情感职能评分、生理职能评分、生理机能评分、心率、舒张压、收缩压指标。 结果 护理结束，观察组Kolcaba评分(83.54±8.16)分、护理满意率(98.80%)、情感职能评分(80.62±9.54)分、生理职能评分(83.77±8.18)分、生理机能评分(85.40±9.82)分高于对照组且差异有统计学意义(t/χ2=10.992、13.557、12.661、15.059、10.874，P, 百拇医药
 [关键词] 观察;应用效果;舒适护理;无痛人流;门诊;人工流产

 [中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2019)06(c)-0155-04

 [Abstract] Objective To investigate the application effect of comfortable nursing in painless abortion in outpatients. Methods A total of 166 patients with abortion who underwent painless abortion from February 2018 to March 2019 were convenient selection enrolled. The randomized method was divided into control group (83 cases) and observation group (83 cases). The former used the basic nursing， the latter applied comfort care， comparing two groups of Kolcaba， SAS， SDS， complication rate， nursing satisfaction rate， emotional function score， physiological function score， physiology function score， heart rate， diastolic blood pressure， systolic blood pressure index. Results At the end of nursing， the observation group Kolcaba score (83.54±8.16)points， nursing satisfaction rate (98.80%)， emotional function score (80.62±9.54)points， physiological function score (83.77±8.18)points， physiological function score (85.40±9.82)points， were higher than the control group and the difference was significant (t/χ2=10.992， 13.557， 12.661， 15.059， 10.874，P, 百拇医药(张爱萍) 第 1 2 3 页 下一页
 百拇医药网 http://www.100md.com/html/paper/1674-0742/2019/18/51.htm