[摘要] 目的 探討心理护理及用药护理在静脉滴注催产素引产中的应用效果。 方法 方便选取2018年6月—2019年6月该院宫颈成熟度评分(Bishop评分)>6分的产妇100名，随机分为两组，两组均给予静脉滴注催产素引产，对照组50名产妇治疗期间接受临床常规护理，研究组50名，在常规护理的基础上加强心理护理及用药护理，对比两组干预后宫颈扩张速率及引产至分娩时长、分娩后出血量，并统计两组最终分娩方式及剖宫产原因，采用自制的满意度调查表了解两组产妇满意度评价。 结果 研究组宫颈扩张速率(2.81±0.54)cm/h高于对照组(2.23±0.35)cm/h，且引产至分娩时长(653.24±51.89)min明显短于对照组(959.68±56.47)min，分娩后出血量(184.54±24.55)mL低于对照组(208.56±35.12)mL，差异有统计学意义(t=4.587、6.987、7.184，P 6 in the hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 were collected and randomly divided into two groups. Both groups were given intravenous infusion of oxytocin to induce labor， the control group 50 cases of parturients received clinical routine nursing during treatment. The study group of 50 cases strengthened psychological nursing and medication nursing on the basis of routine nursing. The two groups were compared with the rate of cervical dilation， the length of time from induction to delivery， and the amount of bleeding after delivery. The final delivery method and the cause of cesarean section were used to understand the satisfaction evaluation of the two groups of mothers using a self-made satisfaction questionnaire. Results The cervical dilation rate (2.81±0.54) cm/h in the study group was higher than that in the control group (2.23±0.35) cm/h， and the time from labor induction to delivery (653.24±51.89) min was significantly shorter than that in the control group (959.68±56.47) min. The blood loss after delivery (184.54±24.55)mL was lower than the control group (208.56±35.12)mL， and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.587， 6.987， 7.184， P, 百拇医药(高珍珍) 第 1 2 3 页 下一页
 百拇医药网 http://www.100md.com/html/paper/1674-0742/2020/31/55.htm