回到顶部
2024-12-23当å‰ä½ç½®ï¼šç½‘站首页 > è¡Œä¸šåŠ¨æ€ > æ•°æ®å…±äº« > 期刊æ‚å¿— >

异甘è‰é…¸é•ã€è¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½åœ¨é¢„é˜²è‚癌血管栓塞术åŽè‚æŸå®³çš„对比

  摘è¦ï¼š 目的 :对比异甘è‰é…¸é•ã€è¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ä¸¤ç§è¯ç‰©åœ¨é¢„防è‚癌血管栓塞术åŽè‚æŸå®³çš„æ•ˆæžœã€‚方法: 选择在我科ä½é™¢çš„åŽŸå‘æ€§è‚癌病人95例为研究对象,根æ®å…¥é™¢æ—¶é—´å•åŒæ—¥åˆ†ä¸ºä¸¤ç»„,A组61例使用还原型谷胱甘肽ã€B组34例使用异甘è‰é…¸é•进行预防。观察指标 术å‰ã€æœ¯åŽ3天两组病例è‚功能的对比。结果: ä¸¤ç»„æœ¯å‰æ€»èƒ†çº¢ç´ å¯¹æ¯”有显著差异(P=0.0494),白蛋白对比有显著差异(P=0.4251),谷丙转氨酶对比无显著差异(P=0. 5644),谷è‰è½¬æ°¨é…¶å¯¹æ¯”有显著差异(P=0. 2120),å‡è¡€é…¶åŽŸæ—¶é—´å¯¹æ¯”æ— æ˜¾è‘—å·®å¼‚(P=0. 9772)ï¼›ä¸¤ç»„æœ¯åŽæ€»èƒ†çº¢ç´ å¯¹æ¯”有显著差异(P=0.0205),白蛋白对比有显著差异(P=0.2502),谷丙转氨酶对比有显著差异(P=0. 0195),谷è‰è½¬æ°¨é…¶å¯¹æ¯”有显著差异(P=0. 0062),å‡è¡€é…¶åŽŸæ—¶é—´å¯¹æ¯”æ— æ˜¾è‘—å·®å¼‚(P=0. 5105)。结论: 异甘è‰é…¸é•在预防è‚癌血管栓塞术åŽè‚æŸå®³çš„æ•ˆæžœç¨ä¼˜äºŽè¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ã€‚

 å…³é”®è¯ï¼š 异甘è‰é…¸é• 还原型谷胱甘肽 è‚癌血管栓塞术 è‚功能 预防
, http://www.100md.com
 Abstract: objective to compare different magnesium glycyrrhizic acid and reduced glutathione two drugs in the prevention of liver cancer vascular embolization of postoperative liver damage effect. Methods 95 cases with primary liver cancer patients hospitalized in our department as the research object, according to admission time ChanShuangRi divided into two groups, A group of 61 cases with reduced glutathione, B group of 34 cases using different glycyrrhizic acid magnesium for prevention. Observation indexes of preoperative and postoperative 3 days two groups of cases of liver function. Results two groups of preoperative total bilirubin compared with significant difference (P = 0.0494), albumin contrast significant differences (P = 0.4251), alanine aminotransferase compared to no significant difference (P = 0. 5644), aspertate aminotransferase compared with significant difference (P = 0. 2120), prothrombin time compared with no significant difference (P = 0. 9772)ï¼› Two groups of postoperative total bilirubin compared with significant difference (P = 0.0205), albumin contrast significant differences (P = 0.2502), alanine aminotransferase compared with significant difference (P = 0. 0195), aspertate aminotransferase compared with significant difference (P = 0. 0062), prothrombin time compared with no significant difference (P = 0. 5105). Conclusion different glycyrrhizic acid magnesium in preventing postoperative liver damage liver vascular embolism was slightly better than the effect of reduced glutathione.
, 百拇医è¯
 Keywords: glycyrrhizic acid magnesium Reduced glutathione liver vascular embolization Liver function is to prevent

 ç›®å‰åŽŸå‘æ€§è‚ç™Œçš„æ²»ç–—ä»¥ç»¼åˆæ²»ç–—为主,其中è‚癌血管栓塞术是微创手术较常用的方法,但è‚癌血管栓塞术常引起è‚功能的æŸå®³ï¼Œç”šè‡³è‚è¡°ç«­çš„å‘生,在临床工作中常使用异甘è‰é…¸é•注射液ã€è¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ç²‰é’ˆå‰‚è¿›è¡Œä¿è‚治疗,å‡å–得较好的效果,为预防è‚癌血管栓塞术åŽå‡ºçŽ°è‚æŸå®³ï¼Œæœ¬ç ”究选择常用的2ç§ä¿è‚è¯è¿›è¡Œæœ¯å‰ç”¨è¯å¯¹æ¯”。ç»å¯¹æ¯”å‘现异甘è‰é…¸é•注射液在预防è‚癌血管栓塞术åŽå‡ºçŽ°è‚æŸå®³çš„æ•ˆæžœç¨ä¼˜äºŽè¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ç²‰é’ˆå‰‚ã€‚çŽ°æŠ¥å‘Šå¦‚ä¸‹ï¼š

 èµ„料与方法

 1.èµ„æ–™æ¥æº 选择于2014å¹´5月~2015å¹´3月在我科ä½é™¢çš„åŽŸå‘æ€§è‚癌病人95例为研究对象,其中男性82例,女性13例,年龄24~77å²ã€‚分为两组,A组61例,其中男性54例,女性7例,年龄24~72å²ï¼›B组34例,男性28例,女性6例,年龄24~77å²ã€‚所有病例å‡åšå½±åƒå­¦æ£€æŸ¥(Bè¶…ã€CTã€è‚动脉造影)ã€è‚功能(总胆红素ã€ç™½è›‹ç™½ã€è°·ä¸™è½¬æ°¨é…¶ã€è°·è‰è½¬æ°¨é…¶ã€å‡è¡€é…¶åŽŸæ—¶é—´)ã€AFPï¼Œæ˜Žç¡®ä¸ºåŽŸå‘æ€§è‚癌,肿瘤直径å°äºŽ8cm。, 百拇医è¯(覃祖云等) 第 1 2 页 下一页
 ç™¾æ‹‡åŒ»è¯ç½‘ http://www.100md.com/html/paper/1674-9855/2015/27/319.htm
上一篇:å¯å¼¯æ›²æ©¡çš®éšœæž¶åœ¨æ ¹ç®¡æ²»ç–—患者的应用评价(医学研究)
下一篇:应用阿托å“è”åˆå¥¥ç¾Žæ‹‰å”‘治疗急性胃炎的临床研究
Copyright © 2012-2024. All rights reserved  å¤‡æ¡ˆå·ï¼šäº¬ICP备06040839å·-8  XML地图  æ¨¡æ¿å·´å·´
è¡Œä¸šåŠ¨æ€ | 生活ä¿å¥ | ä¸­åŒ»ä¸­è¯ | 美容天地

扫ç å…³æ³¨å…¬ä¼—å·