摘è¦ï¼š 目的 :对比异甘è‰é…¸é•ã€è¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ä¸¤ç§è¯ç‰©åœ¨é¢„防è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯åŽè‚æŸå®³çš„æ•ˆæžœã€‚方法: 选择在我科ä½é™¢çš„åŽŸå‘æ€§è‚癌病人95ä¾‹ä¸ºç ”ç©¶å¯¹è±¡ï¼Œæ ¹æ®å…¥é™¢æ—¶é—´å•åŒæ—¥åˆ†ä¸ºä¸¤ç»„,A组61例使用还原型谷胱甘肽ã€B组34例使用异甘è‰é…¸é•è¿›è¡Œé¢„é˜²ã€‚è§‚å¯ŸæŒ‡æ ‡ 术å‰ã€æœ¯åŽ3天两组病例è‚功能的对比。结果: ä¸¤ç»„æœ¯å‰æ€»èƒ†çº¢ç´ 对比有显著差异(P=0.0494),白蛋白对比有显著差异(P=0.4251)ï¼Œè°·ä¸™è½¬æ°¨é…¶å¯¹æ¯”æ— æ˜¾è‘—å·®å¼‚(P=0. 5644),谷è‰è½¬æ°¨é…¶å¯¹æ¯”有显著差异(P=0. 2120),å‡è¡€é…¶åŽŸæ—¶é—´å¯¹æ¯”æ— æ˜¾è‘—å·®å¼‚(P=0. 9772)ï¼›ä¸¤ç»„æœ¯åŽæ€»èƒ†çº¢ç´ 对比有显著差异(P=0.0205),白蛋白对比有显著差异(P=0.2502),谷丙转氨酶对比有显著差异(P=0. 0195),谷è‰è½¬æ°¨é…¶å¯¹æ¯”有显著差异(P=0. 0062),å‡è¡€é…¶åŽŸæ—¶é—´å¯¹æ¯”æ— æ˜¾è‘—å·®å¼‚(P=0. 5105)。结论: 异甘è‰é…¸é•在预防è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯åŽè‚æŸå®³çš„æ•ˆæžœç¨ä¼˜äºŽè¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ã€‚
关键è¯ï¼š 异甘è‰é…¸é• 还原型谷胱甘肽 è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯ è‚功能 预防
, http://www.100md.com
Abstract: objective to compare different magnesium glycyrrhizic acid and reduced glutathione two drugs in the prevention of liver cancer vascular embolization of postoperative liver damage effect. Methods 95 cases with primary liver cancer patients hospitalized in our department as the research object, according to admission time ChanShuangRi divided into two groups, A group of 61 cases with reduced glutathione, B group of 34 cases using different glycyrrhizic acid magnesium for prevention. Observation indexes of preoperative and postoperative 3 days two groups of cases of liver function. Results two groups of preoperative total bilirubin compared with significant difference (P = 0.0494), albumin contrast significant differences (P = 0.4251), alanine aminotransferase compared to no significant difference (P = 0. 5644), aspertate aminotransferase compared with significant difference (P = 0. 2120), prothrombin time compared with no significant difference (P = 0. 9772); Two groups of postoperative total bilirubin compared with significant difference (P = 0.0205), albumin contrast significant differences (P = 0.2502), alanine aminotransferase compared with significant difference (P = 0. 0195), aspertate aminotransferase compared with significant difference (P = 0. 0062), prothrombin time compared with no significant difference (P = 0. 5105). Conclusion different glycyrrhizic acid magnesium in preventing postoperative liver damage liver vascular embolism was slightly better than the effect of reduced glutathione.
, 百拇医è¯
Keywords: glycyrrhizic acid magnesium Reduced glutathione liver vascular embolization Liver function is to prevent
ç›®å‰åŽŸå‘æ€§è‚ç™Œçš„æ²»ç–—ä»¥ç»¼åˆæ²»ç–—为主,其ä¸è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯æ˜¯å¾®åˆ›æ‰‹æœ¯è¾ƒå¸¸ç”¨çš„æ–¹æ³•ï¼Œä½†è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯å¸¸å¼•èµ·è‚功能的æŸå®³ï¼Œç”šè‡³è‚è¡°ç«çš„å‘生,在临床工作ä¸å¸¸ä½¿ç”¨å¼‚甘è‰é…¸é•注射液ã€è¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ç²‰é’ˆå‰‚è¿›è¡Œä¿è‚治疗,å‡å–得较好的效果,为预防è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯åŽå‡ºçŽ°è‚æŸå®³ï¼Œæœ¬ç ”究选择常用的2ç§ä¿è‚è¯è¿›è¡Œæœ¯å‰ç”¨è¯å¯¹æ¯”。ç»å¯¹æ¯”å‘现异甘è‰é…¸é•注射液在预防è‚ç™Œè¡€ç®¡æ “å¡žæœ¯åŽå‡ºçŽ°è‚æŸå®³çš„æ•ˆæžœç¨ä¼˜äºŽè¿˜åŽŸåž‹è°·èƒ±ç”˜è‚½ç²‰é’ˆå‰‚ã€‚çŽ°æŠ¥å‘Šå¦‚ä¸‹ï¼š
资料与方法
1.èµ„æ–™æ¥æº 选择于2014å¹´5月~2015å¹´3月在我科ä½é™¢çš„åŽŸå‘æ€§è‚癌病人95ä¾‹ä¸ºç ”ç©¶å¯¹è±¡ï¼Œå…¶ä¸ç”·æ€§82例,女性13例,年龄24~77å²ã€‚分为两组,A组61例,其ä¸ç”·æ€§54例,女性7例,年龄24~72å²ï¼›B组34例,男性28例,女性6例,年龄24~77å²ã€‚所有病例å‡åšå½±åƒå¦æ£€æŸ¥(Bè¶…ã€CTã€è‚åŠ¨è„‰é€ å½±)ã€è‚功能(æ€»èƒ†çº¢ç´ ã€ç™½è›‹ç™½ã€è°·ä¸™è½¬æ°¨é…¶ã€è°·è‰è½¬æ°¨é…¶ã€å‡è¡€é…¶åŽŸæ—¶é—´)ã€AFPï¼Œæ˜Žç¡®ä¸ºåŽŸå‘æ€§è‚癌,肿瘤直径å°äºŽ8cm。, 百拇医è¯(覃祖云ç‰) 第 1 2 页 下一页
百拇医è¯ç½‘ http://www.100md.com/html/paper/1674-9855/2015/27/319.htm
