第1页å‚è§é™„ä»¶(1921KB,2页)。
[摘è¦] 目的 比较ä¸åŒæµ“度罗哌å¡å› ç‰æ¯”é‡è…°éº»åœ¨å‰–宫产术ä¸çš„麻醉效果。 方法 å°†180例行剖宫产手术å•å¦‡éšæœºåˆ†ä¸ºA组ã€B组åŠC组,æ¯ç»„å„60例,分别给予0.75%ã€0.50%å’Œ0.30%çš„ç‰æ¯”é‡ç½—哌å¡å› 进行腰麻,比较三组在剖宫产术ä¸çš„éº»é†‰æ•ˆæžœã€æ„Ÿè§‰è¿åŠ¨é˜»æ»žæƒ…å†µåŠä¸è‰¯å应å‘生率。 结果 A组ã€B组åŠC组麻醉优良率分别为91.7%ã€90.0%å’Œ56.7%,Aã€B组显著优于C组(P 0.05)ï¼›A组åŠB组感觉è¿åŠ¨é˜»æ»žèµ·æ•ˆæ—¶é—´ã€ç—›è§‰é˜»æ»žæ—¶é—´æ˜¾è‘—优于C组(P 0.05)ï¼›ä¸‰ç»„æ„Ÿè§‰é˜»æ»žå¹³é¢æ¯”è¾ƒï¼Œå·®å¼‚æ— ç»Ÿè®¡å¦æ„义(P > 0.05)ï¼›A组ã€B组åŠC组ä¸è‰¯å应å‘生率分别为16.6%ã€15.0%å’Œ13.4%ï¼Œä¸‰ç»„æ¯”è¾ƒå·®å¼‚æ— ç»Ÿè®¡å¦æ„义(P > 0.05)。 结论 0.5%罗哌å¡å› ç‰æ¯”é‡è…°éº»å¯æ»¡è¶³å‰–å®«äº§æ‰‹æœ¯çš„è¦æ±‚,具有麻醉起效时间快ã€ä¸è‰¯å应少的特点。
[关键è¯] 剖宫产;罗哌å¡å› ;腰麻
[ä¸å›¾åˆ†ç±»å·] R614.41 [æ–‡çŒ®æ ‡è¯†ç ] A [æ–‡ç« ç¼–å·] 1673-7210(2012)02(c)-0082-02
Effect comparison on the different concentrations of isobaric Ropivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section
CUI Zhijian1 WANG Xiuju2â–² ZHANG Xiaozhe1 DING Xiubo1
1.Department of Anesthesiology, the Forth Hospital of Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150000, China; 2.Outpatient Department, the Forth Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150000, China
[Abstract] Objective To compare the effect of different concentrations of isobaric Ropivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section. Methods 180 cases scheduled for cesarean section were randomly divided into group A (0.75% Ropivacaine), group B (0.50% Ropivacaine) and group C (0.30% Ropivacaine), with 60 cases each in group. Anesthetic effect, motor block, sensory block and incidence of adverse reactions were compared among three groups. Results Excellent and good rate were 91.7%, 90.0% and 56.7% in group A, group B and group C, of which much higher in group A and group B than group C (P 0.05); the onset time of motor and sensory block and the duration of sensory in group A and group B were shorter than that of group C (P 0.05); there were no significantly difference of incidence of adverse reactions among three groups (16.6% vs 15.0% vs 13.4%) (P > 0.05). Conclusion 0.5% isobaric Ropivacaine meets the needs of cesarean section because of faster anesthetic effect time and less adverse reactions ......
