
ã€æ‘˜è¦ã€‘ 目的 探讨西酞普兰与马普替林治疗è€å¹´æŠ‘éƒç—‡çš„疗效和ä¸è‰¯å应。方法 å°†80例è€å¹´æŠ‘éƒç—‡æ‚£è€…éšæœºåˆ†æˆä¸¤ç»„,一组æœç”¨è¥¿é…žæ™®å…°ï¼Œå¦ä¸€ç»„æœç”¨é©¬æ™®æ›¿æž—,疗程6周。采用汉密顿抑éƒé‡è¡¨(HAMD)åŠè¯ç‰©å‰¯å应é‡è¡¨(TESS)评定疗效和ä¸è‰¯å应。结果 西酞普兰组显效率为80%;马普替林组显效率为72.5%,ä¸¤ç»„å·®å¼‚æ— æ˜¾è‘—æ€§ã€‚è¥¿é…žæ™®å…°ç»„ä¸è‰¯å应较马普替林组少而轻。结论 西酞普兰治疗è€å¹´æŠ‘éƒç—‡çš„疗效确切,起效快,ä¸è‰¯å应轻,ä¾ä»Žæ€§å¥½ã€‚
ã€å…³é”®è¯ã€‘ 抑éƒç—‡ï¼›è€å¹´ï¼›è¥¿é…žæ™®å…°ï¼›é©¬æ™®æ›¿æž—
A Comparative Study of Citalopram and Maprotiline in Elderly Depressive Patients. Sun Meiling, Wang Yongxue, Huang Xiaozhen. Zhumadian Mental Hospital of Henan Province, Zhumadian 463000, P.R.China
ã€Abstract】 Objective To study the efficacy and side effects of citalopram and maprotiline in the treatment of elderly depressive patients. Methods 80 old in-patients with depression were randomly assigned to citalopram group and maprotiline group for six weeks. Hamilton depressive scale(HAMD) and treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS) were used to assess the clinical efficacy and side effects. Results The significant improvement rate of citalopram was 80% and that of maprotlline was 72.5%. There was no significant difference between the two groups, but the side effects of citalopram were fewer and milder than that of maprotiline. Conclusion Citalopram is an effective antidepressant in elderly patients with fewer side effects and takes effect rapidly. ......
百拇医è¯ç½‘ http://www.100md.com/html/paper/1005-1252/2008/03/33.htm
您现在查看是摘è¦é¡µï¼Œå…¨æ–‡é•¿ 4372 å—符。
