
å‚è§é™„ä»¶(1118KB,2页)。
[摘è¦]目的:æ¯”è¾ƒä¸¤ç§æ–¹æ³•ä¿®å¤ä¸Šä¸åˆ‡ç‰™å¤§é¢ç§¯åˆ‡è§’缺æŸçš„临床疗效。方法:选择59例(60颗牙)患者,é‡‡ç”¨éšæœºæ–¹æ³•分为两组,A组仅使用å¤åˆæ ‘è„‚ä¿®å¤,B组使用å¤åˆæ ‘è„‚åŠ è‡ªæ”»èžºçº¹é’‰è”åˆä¿®å¤,于修å¤åŽ3年以改良美国公共å¥åº·éƒ¨(United States Public Health Service,USPHS)åˆ¶å®šçš„è¯„å®šç³»ç»Ÿæ ‡å‡†è®°å½•ä¿®å¤æ•ˆæžœã€‚结果:采用é…对χ2检验,比较两ç§ä¿®å¤æ–¹æ³•åœ¨ä¿®å¤æ•ˆæžœä¸Šæ— 显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:通过3年临床观察,å•纯用å¤åˆæ ‘è„‚ä¿®å¤ä¸Šä¸åˆ‡ç‰™å¤§é¢ç§¯åˆ‡è§’缺æŸå…·æœ‰è¾ƒå¥½çš„应用效果。
[关键è¯]å¤åˆæ ‘è„‚;自攻螺纹钉;大é¢ç§¯åˆ‡è§’缺æŸ
[ä¸å›¾åˆ†ç±»å·]R783 [æ–‡çŒ®æ ‡è¯†ç ]A [æ–‡ç« ç¼–å·]1008-6455(2010)07-1039-02
Clinical evaluation of two methods in treatment of upper central incisor severe corner lesions
LI Yan,TANG Ji-wei,Shi Chun-mei
(Department of Stomatology,People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning 530021,Guangxi,China)
Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the 3-year clinical performance of two different methods in treatment of upper central incisor severe corner lesions.Methods59 patients with upper central incisor severe corner lesions were enrolled in this study. A total of 60 lesions were restored randomly with either composite resin only or self-threading pin with composite resin. The restorations were evaluated at three years after insertion using modified USPHS criteria.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the clinical performance of the two methods. Conclusion When only using composite resin properly in treating upper central incisor severe corner lesions, restorations are retained at a high rate during at least there years of clinical service.
Key words:composite resin;self-threading pin;upper central incisor severe corner lesions
上ä¸åˆ‡ç‰™å¤§é¢ç§¯åˆ‡è§’缺æŸå¦‚适åˆä½¿ç”¨æ ‘è„‚ä¿®å¤,常采用固ä½é’‰å¢žåŠ å›ºä½,但置入固ä½é’‰æ—¶æ˜“使牙体穿å”ã€æŠ˜è£‚æˆ–æ„外穿髓,æ•°å¹´åŽå¤æŸ¥æ—¶å¯å‘现固ä½é’‰å¹¶ä¸åƒå»ºç‘ç”¨çš„é’¢ç‹æ°´æ³¥ä¸€æ ·æ··æˆä¸€ä½“æ¥å¢žåŠ å¤åˆæ ‘脂的强度,å……å¡«ä½“æŠ˜æ–æ—¶æ–é¢å¾€å¾€æ˜¯å›ºä½é’‰ä¸Žå¤åˆæ ‘脂的界é¢,而且固ä½é’‰å¯å› 微渗æ¼è¢«è…蚀,使修å¤ä½“和牙齿å˜è‰²[1]ã€‚ç”±äºŽç²˜ç»“æŠ€æœ¯ä¸æ–å‘展进æ¥,æˆ‘ä»¬è€ƒè™‘ä¿®å¤æ¤ç§ç¼ºæŸæ—¶å•çº¯ä½¿ç”¨æ ‘è„‚æ¢å¤æ‚£ç‰™å¤–å½¢,并与使用固ä½é’‰çš„病例作对比,è¯„ä¼°è¿™ä¸¤ç§æ–¹æ³•的临床疗效。
1ææ–™å’Œæ–¹æ³•
1.1 临床资料:选择自2003å¹´1月~2006å¹´1月在我科门诊就诊的患者59例(60颗)部分缺æŸçš„上ä¸åˆ‡ç‰™,å…¶ä¸ç”·æ€§32例,女性27例,年龄17~65å²ã€‚çº³å…¥æ ‡å‡†:①上ä¸åˆ‡ç‰™ç¼ºæŸèŒƒå›´â‰¥ç‰™å† 体积1/4但ä¸è¶…过1/2,ç¼ºæŸæœªè¾¾é¾ˆä¸‹;②患牙为æ’ç‰™ä¸”æ— ç‰™é¾ˆç‚Žç—‡;③没有咬åˆå¹²æ‰°;â‘£å£è…”å«ç”Ÿæƒ…况好;â‘¤æ‚£è€…è¦æ±‚ä¿å®ˆæ²»ç–—;⑥医从性好。所有患者ç¾ç½²çŸ¥æƒ…åŒæ„书。
1.2ææ–™å’Œä»ªå™¨:氢氧化钙Ca(OH)2(Dycal,Dentsply,美国),37%磷酸å‡èƒ¶(广州åŽå—医疗器械有é™å…¬å¸),3M AdperPrompt 粘结剂(3M ESPE,美国),Te-Economæ ‘è„‚(Ivoclar Vivadent,列支敦士登),LITEXTM695LED光固化ç¯(Dentamerica,美国),自攻螺纹钉(æå·žæ–°äºšä»ªè¡¨å™¨æ¢°åŽ‚)。
1.3方法
1.3.1分组:å°†60é¢—æ‚£ç‰™éšæœºåˆ†ä¸ºä¸¤ç»„,æ¯ç»„30颗。A组仅采用å¤åˆæ ‘è„‚ä¿®å¤,B组则使用自攻螺纹钉与å¤åˆæ ‘è„‚è”åˆä¿®å¤ã€‚
1.3.2实验方法:去净è…è´¨åŠè¿‡è–„çš„æ— åŸºé‡‰,唇侧洞缘釉质斜é¢é‡‡ç”¨ç«ç„°çŠ¶é‡‘åˆšçŸ³è½¦é’ˆåˆ¶å¤‡,将洞缘釉质磨æˆä¸Žæ´žå£æˆ45°~70°角的斜é¢,宽度1.0~2.0mm。活髓牙近髓者使用光固化Ca(OH)2护髓,37%磷酸å‡èƒ¶é…¸èš€,牙釉质30s,牙本质15s,ä¸åŠ åŽ‹å†²æ´—10s,使用三用枪高压冲洗5~10s,å¹å¹²,涂布釉质粘结剂,用气枪将其å¹åŒ€ã€å¹è–„,A组在舌é¢åˆ¶ä½œé¸ 尾固ä½å½¢,ç›´æŽ¥å°†é€‰å¥½è‰²çš„æ ‘è„‚åˆ†å±‚å……å¡«äºŽç¼ºæŸåŒº ......